№1(7) 2024

DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2024-1-47

Pukhlyk S, Diedykova I, Yevchev F, Titarenko O.

EVALUATION OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE ADAPTATION OF THE OLFACTORY QUESTIONNAIRE (OQ) FOR DETERMINING
THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH OLFACTORY DYSFUNCTION

Pukhlik Sergey Mikhailovich
Odessa National Medical University
Head of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
E-mail: lor@te.net.ua
Orchid: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-9642
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6506298353
 
Diedykova Iryna V.
Odessa National Medical University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology
Assistant
Candidate of Medical Sciences
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-7690
E-mail: irshka@ukr.net
 
Yevchev Fedor D.
Otolaryngologist-oncologist of Odessa City Hospital №11
Odesa National Medical University, Professor of the Department of Otolaryngology
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
E-mail: dr.yevchev@ukr.net
Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-811X   
Titarenko Olga V.
Odessa National Medical University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology
Associate Professor
Candidate of Medical Sciences
e-mail: otit3333@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-0757

EVALUATION OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE ADAPTATION OF THE OLFACTORY QUESTIONNAIRE (OQ) FOR DETERMINING
THE QUALITY OF LIFE
OF PATIENTS WITH OLFACTORY DYSFUNCTION

Pukhlyk S, Diedykova I, Yevchev F, Tutarenko O.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Odessa National Medical University (Odessa, Ukraine)

Email: lor@te.net.ua

Abstract

Topicality: Smell disorders, confirmed by olfactometry data, occur in 48.5% of cases among patients suffering from various diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Loss of smell occurs in approximately 25% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps and in more than 80% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps. About 15% of patients with allergic rhinitis suffer from dysosmia. Using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible to demonstrate the relevance and expediency of implementing remote diagnostic methods, especially in cases of contagious diseases and in settlements far from medical facilities. To solve these problems, specialized questionnaires are increasingly used, the use of which does not require the involvement of medical personnel and reduces the cost of diagnostic procedures.

Objective: Ukrainian-language adaptation of the Korean Olfactory Questionnaire.

Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.866 in the group of patients with polyposis rhinosinusitis with polyps before treatment; 0.898 in the group of patients with polyposis rhinosinusitis with polyps 3 months after surgical treatment; 0.902 in the group of patients with coronavirus disease at the beginning of the disease and 0.887 in the group of patients 3 months after the disease of coronavirus disease, indicating a high level of agreement in both options for comparing the results of the survey. The average score of the olfactory questionnaire for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps is 21.85±12.4, for patients with coronavirus disease – 18.43±11.3. At the same time, in patients with minor distortions of the nasal membrane without nasal breathing disorders and patients with non-sinonasal symptoms, 46.68±5.18 and 49.24±4.22, respectively. When evaluating the sensitivity by calculating the standardized average response rate (SRM), we noted a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients after treatment. This testifies to the effectiveness of the Ukrainian version of the quality of smell questionnaire. Thus, the SRM was 1.748 for the difference between the mean total survey results of the groups of patients with polyposis rhinosinusitis with polyps before treatment and patients with polyposis rhinosinusitis with polyps 3 months after surgical treatment and 1.654 for the difference between the means of the groups of patients with coronavirus disease at the beginning of the disease and patients 3 months after coronavirus disease, respectively.

Conclusions: The Ukrainian version of the olfactory questionnaire is an effective statistical tool that can be used to study the impact of sinonasal and non-sinonasal pathologies with olfactory dysfunction on patients’ quality of life. It also helps to assess the effectiveness of treatment and its impact on the quality of life indicator in dynamics, remotely and without excessive economic costs.

Keywords: olfactory dysfunction, questionnaire, olfactometry, rhinosinusitis, curvature of the nasal membrane.

References

  1. Aydoğdu I, Atar Y, Aydoğdu Z, Saltürk Z, Ataç E, Doğan Ö, et al. Comparison of Olfactory Function and Quality of Life With Different Surgical Techniques for Nasal Septum Deviation. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(2): 433-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005109.
  2. Bainbridge KE, Byrd-Clark D, Leopold D. Factors Associated With Phantom Odor Perception Among US Adults: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Sep;144(9):807-814. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1446.
  3. Shushlyapina NO, Zhuravlev AS, Nosova YaV. [Treatment of dysosmias in some rhinological diseases]. Otorinolaringologiâ. Vostočnaâ Evropa. 2016;6(1):120-8. [Article in Russian].
  4. Valsamidis K, Printza A, Constantinidis J, Triaridis S. The Impact of Olfactory Dysfunction on the Psychological Status and Quality of Life of Patients with Nasal Obstruction and Septal Deviation. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;24(2): e237-e246. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701269.
  5. Haxel BR. Recovery of olfaction after sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A review. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(5):1053-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.27764.
  6. Choi YS, Ryu YJ, Rhee J, Seok J, Han S, Jin HR, Kim DW. Clinical Implications of Septal Deviation in Lateralized Olfaction. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;9(1):39-43. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.9.1.39.
  7. Poyiadji N, Shahin G, Noujaim D, Stone M, Patel S, Griffith B. COVID19-associated acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy: CT and MRI features. Radiology. 2020;296(2): E119-E120. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201187.
  8. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(7):611-27. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0.
  9. Tsepkolenko AV. [Olfactory dysfunction: prevalence, diagnosis and treatment]. Otorhinolaryngology. 2021;(6):74-86. doi: 10.37219/2528-8253-2021-6-74. [Article in Ukrainian].
  10. Shkorbotun VO, Ovsiienko MO. [The condition of olfactory function and its impact on the quality of life in patients depending on the disorder of the nasal passages’ patency]. Ukrainian medical journal. 2022; 1-2(147-148):57-60. doi: 10.32471/umj.1680-3051.147.226553. [Article in Ukrainian].
  11. Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope. 1984;94(2 Pt 1):176-178.
  12. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. ‘Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 1997;22(1):39-52. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39.
  13. Takagi SF. A standardized olfactometer in Japan. A review over ten years. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987; 510(1):113-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb43476.x
  14. Cain WS, Gent J, Catalanotto FA, Goodspeed RB. Clinical evaluation of olfaction. Am J Otolaryngol. 1983;4(4):252-256. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(83)80068-4
  15. Lukas H, Xu C, Yu Y, Gao W. Emerging Telemedicine Tools for Remote COVID-19 Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Management. ACS Nano. 2020; 14(12):16180-16193. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08494.
  16. Kim JW, Kim HS, Kim M, Kim SH, Cho SW, Kim JY. Validation of Olfactory Questionnaire in Koreans: an Alternative for Conventional Psychophysical Olfactory Tests. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb;36(6):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e34.