№3(7) 2024

DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2024-3-56

Pukhlik SM, Shchelkunov AP, Shchelkunov OA
THE ROLE OF MICROORGANISMS THAT ARE FORMING BIOFILMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOSE PATHOLOGY
AND LYMPHOPHARYNGEAL RING PATHOLOGY AND WAYS OF CORRECTING THE BIOCENOSIS
Pukhlik Sergey Mikhailovich
Odessa National Medical University
Head of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
E-mail: lor@te.net.ua
Orchid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-9642
Scopus Author ID: 6506298353
Shchelkunov Anatolii Petrovych
Odesa National Medical University
Otorhinolaryngology Department
Candidate of Medical Sciences
Email: anatolii_shelkunov@i.ua
Orchid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-5729
 
Щелкунов Олександр Анатолійович
Odesa National Medical University
Otorhinolaryngology Department
Email: anatolii_shelkunov@i.ua
Orchid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4839-5844

Abstract

Topicality: One of the reasons of chronic recurrent inflammatory processes is the ability of bacteria to form a biofilm – a complex grouping that occurs both in the environment and in the human body. The coexistence of pathogenic and conditionally pathogenic microflora in the form of a biofilm creates conditions for the development of a chronic purulent inflammatory process. This form of existence provides a higher resistance and tolerance to antibiotics than planktonic forms, reducing their sensitivity by 1000 times.

The purpose of the study is to improve the quality of treatment of patients suffering from chronic pathology of the nose and lymphopharyngeal ring, using data from the quantitative and qualitative determination of flora in the centre of inflammation and the ability of these microorganisms to form biofilms, to search for the most optimal drugs that destroy biofilms.

Concept of work

In the work with biofilms, the method of determining the optical density of the biofilm was used and, accordingly, the higher the density, the greater the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms. Then, the tested substances were applied in different dilutions to the identified microorganisms in the biofilm, and their predominant ability was determined again by the optical density of the biofilm after exposure to the tested substances, and treatment was carried out with the studied drugs.

56 people with various pathologies of the ENT organs were examined. We can see that St. Aureus has the greatest biofilm-forming ability. In the nose, 33 cases of biofilm formation of moderate optical density and 3 cases of high optical density were noted. In 3 cases, biofilms are not formed. The substances with the greatest destructive ability of biofilms are colloidal silver in 27 cases without dilution and in 6 cases in 1:10 dilution, Povidone-iodine in 24 cases, of which 17 in 1:10 dilution, 6 in 1:20 dilution and 1 case in 1:40 dilution; probiotic drug Bacillus megaterium – in 18 cases, in 1:10 dilution in 9 cases. In the throat, 33 cases of detection of St. Aureus, of which no biofilm is formed in 12 cases, moderate density is formed in 15 cases, and high density in 6 cases.  Medicinal substances under study that suppress biofilm-forming ability are the following – Lysozyme – 21 without dilution, Biclotymolum 18 without dilution and 9 in a 1:10 dilution, probiotic drug Streptococcus salivarius 24 cases without dilution, probiotic drug Bacillus megaterium in 12 cases without breeding.

Streptococcus viridans is the next in number of detected microorganisms. In the nose, 4 cases with a low degree of biofilm formation were found, the examination for sensitivity to medical drugs was not carried out. In the pharynx – 54 cases, of which biofilms are not formed in 12 cases, in 33 cases they are moderate, in 6 cases they are dense. In terms of sensitivity to drugs, we can see the following – Lysozyme 24 without dilution, 3 in a 1:10 dilution; Biclotymolum 27 without dilution, 12 in 1:10 dilution, 3 in 1:20 dilution; probiotic preparation Streptococcus salivarius 30 cases without dilution, 15 cases in dilution 1:10 and 9 – 1:20; Coagulans – 15 without dilution, 3 in 1:10 dilution, 5 in 1:20 dilution; probiotic drug Bacillus megaterium in 21 cases without dilution, 6 in 1:10 dilution. The remaining microorganisms were seeded in small quantities.

Conclusions

  1. The method of determining the biofilm-forming ability of microorganisms based on the optical density of the material must be duplicated by quantitative sowing of flora and sensitivity to antibiotics for greater reliability of the data obtained and the possible use of antibiotics, according to the sensitivity during treatment.
  2. As a result of our research, microorganisms with the greatest ability to form biofilms were identified, as well as a selected range of medical drugs that are available and most effective in suppressing the biofilm-forming abilities of microorganisms, but it is desirable to approach each patient individually.
  3. A number of drugs have been identified that effectively destroy biofilms, especially without dilutions, but only Povidone-iodine does this even at a significant dilution (1:40).
  4. Using the data we received regarding drugs that suppress the biofilm-forming ability of microorganisms, we consider it necessary to continue the work and confirm it on a larger number of examined and treated patients.

Key words: microorganisms, inflammatory diseases of the nose and pharynx, biofilms, drugs that destroy biofilms, pain in the pharynx.

References

  1. Haaber J, Leisner JJ, Cohn MT, Catalan-Moreno A, Nielsen JB, Westh H, et al. Bacterial viruses enable their host to acquire antibiotic resistance genes from neighbouring cells. Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 7:7:13333. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13333.
  2. Belbase A, Pant ND, Nepal K, Bibhusan Neupane B, Baidhya R, Baidya R, Lekhak B. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017 Mar 23;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0194-0.
  3. Melnikov OF, Zabolotna DD, Zabolotny DI. Immunodiagnostics, immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis in the clinic of otolaryngology. Message 1. Optimal indicators of systemic immunity in assessing the clinical and laboratory status of patients with inflammatory diseases of the upper respiratory tract (analytical generalization). Otorhinolaryngology. 2019;2(6):4-11. doi: 10.37219/2528-8253-2019-6-04. [Article in Ukrainian].
  4. Gloag ES, German GK, Stoodley P, Wozniak DJ. Viscoelastic properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa variant biofilms. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 26;8(1): 9691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28009-5.
  5. Olsen I. Biofilm-specific antibiotic tolerance and resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015; 34(5):877-86. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2323-z
  6. Bidossi A, De Grandi R, Toscano M, Bottagisio M, De Vecchi E, Gelardi M, Drago L. Probiotics Streptococcus salivarius 24SMB and Streptococcus oralis 89a interfere with biofilm formation of pathogens of the upper respiratory tract. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 13;18(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3576-9.
  7. Vasudevan R. Biofilms: Microbial Cities of Scientific Significance. J Microbiol Exp. 2014;1(3):84-98. doi: 10.15406/jmen.2014.01.00014.
  8. Moo-Young M, editor. Comprehensive Biotechnology (Second Edition). Academic Press; 2011. Chapter 1.41 – Biofilms; p. 547-558. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00064-7.
  9. Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Mark Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest. 2003 Nov;112(10): 1466-77. doi: 10.1172/JCI20365.
  10. Kryvtsova MV. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm-forming effect of substances of plant origin upon opportunistic microorganisms of the oral cavity [dissertation]. Kyiv: O.O. Bohomolets National Medical University; 2021. 45 p.
  11. Srivastava S, Bhargava A.  Biofilms and human health. Biotechnol Lett. 2016 Jan;38(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-1960-8.
  12. Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(12):740-55. doi: 10.1038/ nrmicro.2017.99
  13. Mladina R, Skitarelić N, Musić S, Ristić M. A biofilm exists on healthy mucosa of the paranasal sinuses: a prospectively performed, blinded, scanning electron microscope study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010;35(2):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486. 2010.02097.x
  14. Subtil J, Bajanca-Lavado MP, Rodrigues JC, Duarte A, Reis L, Nogueira I, Jordao L. Prospective observational study of adenoidal biofilms in a paediatric population and their clinical implications. Otolaryngol Pol. 2018 Oct 1;73(1):1-5. doi: 10. 5604/01.3001.0012.5278.
  15. Bayazian G, Sayyahfar S, Safdarian M, Kalantari F. Is there any association between adenoid biofilm and upper airway I nfections in pediatric patients? Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018;53(2):71-7. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.6151.
  16. Franca A, Carvalhais V, Vilanova M, Pier GB, Cerca N. Characterization of an in vitro fed-batch model to obtain cells released from S. epidermidis biofilms. AMB Express. 2016 Mar;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0197-9.
  17. Imchen M, Anju VT, Busi S, Mohan MS, Subhaswaraj P, Dyavaiah M, Kumavath R. Metagenomic insights into taxonomic, functional diversity and inhibitors of microbial biofilms. Microbiol Res. 2022;265:127207. doi: 10.1016/j.micres. 2022.127207.
  18. Mlynek KD, Callahan MT, Shimkevitch AV, Farmer JT, Endres JL, Marchand M, et al. Effects of LowDose Amoxicillin on Staphylococcus aureus USA300 Biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60 (5):2639-51. doi: 10.1128/ AAC.02070-15.
  19. Lin C-D, Tsai M-H, Lin C-W, Ho M-W, Wang C-Y, Tsou Y-A,  et al.  Association of adenoid hyperplasia and bacterial biofilm formation in children with adenoiditis in Taiwan. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):503-11. doi: 10.1007/ s00405-011-1704-x.
  20. Torretta S, Drago L, Marchisio P, Gaffuri M, Clemente IA, Pignataro L. Topographic distribution of biofilm-producing bacteria in adenoid subsites of children with chronic or recurrent middle ear infections. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013; 122(2):109-13. doi: 10.1177/ 000348941312200206.
  21. Ungkanont K, Jootakarn S, Leelaporn A, Kijsinthopchai U, Tanphaichitr A, Vathanophas V, Komoltri C. Association between adenoid bacteriology and clinical characteristics of adenoid-related diseases in children. SAGE Open Med. 2021 Apr 2:9:20503121211006005. doi: 10.1177/ 20503121211006005.
  22. Hamilos DL. Biofilm Formations in Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infection Part 2: Mucosal Biofilm Formation by Respiratory Pathogens and Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies to Inhibit Biofilm Formation or Eradicate Established Biofilm. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Mar 2;21(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0657-x.
  23. Nistico L, Kreft R, Gieseke A, Coticchia JM, Burrows A, Khampang P, et al. Adenoid Reservoir for Pathogenic Biofilm. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Apr; 49(4):1411-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00756-10.
  24. Schilcher K, Horswill AR. Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020 Aug 12;84(3):e00026-19. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00026-19.
  25. Hamilos DL. Biofilm Formations in Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infection Part 2: Mucosal Biofilm Formation by Respiratory Pathogens and Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies to Inhibit Biofilm Formation or Eradicate Established Biofilm. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Mar 2;21(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0657-x.
  26. Iovino F, ed. Streptococcus pneumoniae. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2019. Chao Y, Bergenfelz C, Hakansson AP. Growing and Characterizing Biofilms Formed by Streptococcus pneumonia; p. 147-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9199-0_13
  27. Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(12):740-55. doi: 10.1038/ nrmicro.2017.99.
  28. Lyakh KV, Lugovsky SP, Kosakovsky AL, Shkorbotun YV, Skoryk MA. [Clinico-morphological characteristics and evaluation of tubular rolls in children with hypertrophy of the pharyngeal tonsil]. Clinical and preventive medicine. 2023;(8):6-14. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.8.2023.01. [Article in Ukrainian].