№4(6) 2023

DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2023-4-71

Petruk LG, Kramarenko RP

INDEXES OF OTHOACOUSTIC EMISSION FOR SERVICEMEN OF MFU AT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL FIRING ON A GROUND

Petruk Lyubov G.
Odessa National Medical University
Department of military medicine and disaster medicine
Associate professor of the department
Doctor of Medical Sciences
E-mail: lyubovpetruk0@gmail.com
Orchid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-7054

Kramarenko Roman P
Military medical clinical centre of the South region of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
Head of the otolaryngology clinic
E-mail: romeoKP@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-9434

Abstract

It is known that preparation of servicemen implementation of official duties includes for itself studies on grounds, where firing is executed from a different armament. Possibility of timely exposure of an increase sensitiveness of persons to the noise loading that can be soil for development in future of defeat of the auditory system under act of sounds of high intensity in the conditions of realization of battle actions gives an opportunity to avoid such unfavourable development of events.

The universally recognized objective method for determination of the state of receptor department of auditory analyzer is a method of registration of otoacoustic emission (ОАЕ), that found wide application in the different screenings programs.

Aim: to define changes in the receptor department of auditory analyzer of servicemen from data of отоакустичної emission at implementation of firing on a ground

Materials and methods: an otorhinolaryngologic inspection is conducted 28 servicemen that worked off skills of application of rifle armament (Kalashnikov machinegun without and from under a barrel grenade launcher) in the conditions of ground. Fighters were inspected to realization of firing and directly after them. The inspections of ОАЕ conducted by means of devices: impedance metter-tympanometter of “Sentiero Desktop” PATH MEDICAL Gmbh (Germany), audiometer of Amplivox 270 (Great Britain).

Results and their discussions: Before realization of firing of ОАЕ registered oneself practically in all inspected. After implementation of firing by us repeatedly was undertaken a study of ОАЕ for servicemen of MFU. In 11 persons (of 40,7%) ОАЕ after firing did not register oneself. In 3 (11,1%) – the answer of more sub-zero intensity registered oneself, than to the shootings job processing. In 7 fighters (of 25,9%) amplitude answer grew vice versa. Will mark that these servicemen after firing grumbled about a tingle, feeling of the mode of occurrence, cotton “wool” in ears. Such unpleasant feeling lasted 1-6 hours after firing. For all other servicemen of ОАЕ registered oneself approximately at the same level, that and to implementation tasks.

Pays attention on itself, that the most meaningful changes are an increase or decline – amplitudes of answer to ОАЕ we registered for the investigated persons in the area of 4-6 kHz, that answers the basal area. The expressive enough change of amplitude of answer to ОАЕ is registered in inspected on frequency of 4 kHz can be the sign of reaction to the receptor in the corresponding area of cochlea on the noise loading that shows up an increase or oppression of his activity, and can testify including to violation of adaptation reactions in reply to the sounds of high intensivity.

Conclusions:

  1. Undertaken studies testify to importance of determination of ОАЕ on frequency of foods distortions for servicemen, that execute the educational firing on a ground that assists the timely and objective exposure of possible defeats of receptor structures of auditory analyser.
  2. The results of registration of DРОАЕ can be drawn on for prognostication of possible development of sensorineural violations at presence of unfavourable factors at battle acoustic trauma. The methodology can be used for screening or determining the suitability of military personnel to perform duties in certain branches of the military (e.g. artillery).
  3. Change of reactivity of receptor department of auditory analyser as an increase or decline of amplitude of answer to ОАЕ, especially in the zone of frequencies of 4-6 кГц can serve as the objective sign of unfavourable prognosis in relation to development of SNHL at voice loading.

Key words: otoacoustic emission, hearing analyser, sensorineural disorders, acoustic barotrauma.

References

  1. Bockstael A, Keppler H, Dhooge I, D’haenens W, Maes L, et al. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol. 2008 Mar;47(3):119-33. doi: 10.1080/14992020701704784.
  2. Butler BE, Purcell DW, Allen P. Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):530-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.582167.
  3. Girard SA, Picard M, Davis AC, Simard M, Larocque R, Leroux T, Turcotte F. Multiple work-related accidents: tracing the role of hearing status and noise exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;66(5):319-24. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037713.
  4. Hatzopoulos S, Ciorba A, Petruccelli J, Grasso D, Sliwa L, et al. Estimation of pure-tone thresholds in adults using extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output-functions and auditory steady state responses. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(9):625-31. doi: 10.1080/14992020902998391.
  5. Lee HY, Kim D-K, Park Y-H, Cha WW, Kim GJ, Lee SH. Prognostic factors for profound sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):143-149. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4276-y.
  6. Mathai JP, Mohammed H. Effect of hearing aid release time and presentation level on speech perception in noise in elderly individuals with hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(2):671-677. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4282-0. 
  7. Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M, Studler M, Ghernaouti C, Baffioni-Venturi A, et al. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hear Res. 2009 May;251(1-2):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.008.
  8. Konovalov ES. [Otoacoustic emission of the products of decomposition (DPOAE) in patients with extravasal compression of vertebral arteries]. Visnik problem biologii I medicini. 2013;2(3):167-169. [Article in Ukrainian].
  9. Mitchell TV, Maslin T. How vision matters for individuals with hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2007 Sep;46(9):500-11. doi: 10.1080/14992020701383050.
  10. Serra A, Bardino R, Saccà CM, Micheloni GP. [Analysis of audiometric data as a contribution to the noise risk assessment]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2011 Jul-Sep;33(3 Suppl):118-21. [Article in Italian].
  11. Shupak A, Zeidan R, Shemesh R. Otoacoustic emissions in the prediction of sudden sensorineural hearing loss outcome. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1691-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000627.
  12. Southall K, Jennings MB, Gagné JP. Factors that influence disclosure of hearing loss in the workplace. Int J Audiol. 2011 Oct;50(10):699-707. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.588963.
  13. Shydlovska TA, Petruk L.G. [Indicators of otoacoustic emission on frequency of products of distortions in persons, which have got acoustic trauma in the zone of anti-terroristic operation, with different degree of disorders in the hearing function]. Ukrainian journal of occupational health. 2018;56(3):43-54. [Article in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2018.03.043.